|
| |||
|
opening it up with Common Lisp |
|||
|
Favorite weblogs Lisp Related Politics Other home Recent Readings
Book review: Darwinia
Summer reading: Spin
Runner
the Omnivoire's Delimma
the Golem's Eye |
|
Thoughts on Folksonomy Most readers of this weblog have probably already seen Del.ici.us, the social bookmark website. It lets people share and categorize bookmarks collaboratively. The categorization exists in what has come to be called a Folksonomy (which is a nice neologism). This is good but as the Wikipedia entry on social bookmarking says
Some see this as a benefit
Wikis are nice, e-mail is nice, wood stoves are nice too. Nonetheless I get tired of chopping wood sometimes and of managing SPAM and of having to edit multiple pages to manage to-do lists and categorization. Web applications may not have wasted features (see also this peon for general simplicity) but they often seem to waste my time and mental effort. The way I see it (from a distance, through a glass, darkly), the semantic web provides mechanisms for structuring the web but is not structuring itself. That requires the addition of categorization and structure (C&S). A few years ago, categorization was done entirely by humans, was private and only occasionally persistent (i.e., bookmark lists). Today, Google does a sort of on the fly categorization, Clusty does real clustering, Wikis and Del.ici.us provide persistent, human created structure. Life is better. There are, however, at least two opportunities here: 1. Applying topic tracking, categorization, clustering and other AI techniques to the creation and application of C&S 2. Extending the sort of things one can say in C&S. For example, adding the mechanisms to "define and refine categories, synonym/antonym control, related terms and hierarchy. These are all the sorts of things that "real" ontologies / taxonomies should have. Doing this right would be good. | |
|
|
Home | About | Quotes | Recent | Archives Copyright -- Gary Warren King, 2004 - 2006 |